About Us
News
Announcement
Research
Conservation & Horticulture
Public Education
Graduate Study
Scientist
International Cooperation
Resources
Annual Reports
Publications & Papers
Visit XTBG
Societies
XTBG Seminar
Open Positions
4th XSBN Symposium
CAS-SEABRI
PFS-Tropical Asia
Links
 
   Location:Home > Research > Research Progress
Cooperation breaks down in Asian elephants when food reward is limited
Author: Li Lili
ArticleSource:
Update time: 2021-10-20
Close
Text Size: A A A
Print

Cooperation (i.e. joint action for common benefits) is a widespread social construct in the animal kingdom, as it aims to maximize benefits through joint action. It has been hypothesized that mitigation mechanisms have co-emerged to manage competition. However, research in this area is limited, especially in nonprimates. 

In a recent study published in Plos Biology, researchers from Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG) and their collaborators investigated the varying levels of competition and cooperation in a controlled experimental study with Asian elephant (Elephas maximus). They found that cooperation was maintained at a high rate (more than 80% of the time) even in the face of competition, and only broke down when the food on the table was limited and could easily be monopolized. 

In order to understand how elephants maintain their cooperative relationships when competition can occur, the researchers studied a group of 9 semi-wild Asian elephants in Myanmar by exposing them to an open-access loose-string pulling apparatus. 

The researchers offered two (2) food trays on the apparatus first to observe whether competitive behavior appeared and how the elephants mitigated this behavior across pairings to maintain cooperation. They then reduced 2 food trays to one (1) to see if cooperation continued when food was limited. 

In the 2-tray phase in which 1 tray of food was placed on either end of the table, the cooperation frequency was high. However, after changed from the cooperative 2-tray to the more competitive 1-tray condition (in which the food remained divisible but was clumped in 1 tray), cooperation broke down quickly. 

It was clear the elephants wanted to continue cooperating and thus often adopted various strategies to mitigate competition. Elephants applied “block,” “fight back,” “leave,” “move side,” and “submission” as mitigation strategies and adjusted these strategies according to their affiliation and rank difference with competition initiators. 

“When food resources were limited, costly competition behaviors (“monopoly” and “fight”) prevailed, leading to the breakdown of cooperation”, said Li Lili of XTBG. 

  

Contact 

QUAN Ruichang  Ph.D Principal Investigator  

Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China             

E-mail: quanrc@xtbg.ac.cn     

 

 

The loose-string cooperation apparatus  was placed outside of the enclosure so that the table was not accessible to the elephants at the beginning of a trial. (Image by LI Lili) 

  Appendix Download
Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Menglun, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China
Copyright XTBG 2005-2014 Powered by XTBG Information Center