About Us
News
Announcement
Research
Conservation & Horticulture
Public Education
Graduate Study
Scientist
International Cooperation
Resources
Annual Reports
Publications & Papers
Visit XTBG
Societies
XTBG Seminar
Open Positions
4th XSBN Symposium
CAS-SEABRI
PFS-Tropical Asia
Links
 
   Location:Home > Research > Research Progress
Ant repellents function as exploitation barriers of pollination
Author: Francisco G. Gonzálvez
ArticleSource:
Update time: 2015-05-21
Close
Text Size: A A A
Print

In the context of the nectar protection hypothesis, ant repellents are exploitation barriers: they prevent nectar thieves from reaching the resource produced to attract pollinators. In the context of the pollinator protection hypothesis, they are not exploitation barriers —ants interfere with pollination but do not consume the resources produced by flowers. Previous work supports the pollinator and nectar protection hypotheses. However, no study has been designed specifically to test them within the comparative framework, correcting for phylogenetic correlations between plant species.

Together with researchers from Spain, Prof. CHEN Jin of Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG) predicted that ant repellence should be smallest in nectarless flowers pollinated by large bees, intermediate in flowers producing nectar or pollinated by small bees and greatest in flowers producing nectar and pollinated by small bees. To test the predictions, they selected 32 species of flowering plants, belonging to 27 families, including trees, shrubs and vines and assessed whether young inflorescences of those species repelled weaver ants, Oecophylla smaragdina. They measured ant repellence in the 32 plant species and used phylogenetically corrected models to test whether nectar production, size of bee pollinator and growth form affected ant repellence.

 The results showed that flowers with nectar and flowers pollinated by small bees produced more ant repellents than nectarless flowers and flowers pollinated by large bees of the genus Xylocopa, respectively. In addition, flowers from trees showed more ant repellence than flowers from shrubs and vines.

The study validated the pollinator protection hypothesis and the nectar protection hypothesis. Depending on the ecological context, therefore, ant repellents can function as direct or indirect exploitation barriers. As direct barriers, ant repellents can prevent ants from removing nectar without effecting pollination. As indirect barriers, ants chase small ineffective pollinators away when flowers are pollinated by large bees, the absence of repellents or even with the presence or ant attractants.

The study entitled “The function of ant repellence by flowers: testing the ‘nectar protection’ and ‘pollinator protection’ hypotheses” has been published online in Evolutionary Ecology.

  Appendix Download
Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Menglun, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China
Copyright XTBG 2005-2014 Powered by XTBG Information Center